Economics

Japan – Upper House Election Outcome and Thoughts 2022

13 Jul, 2022

FORGING AHEAD

In the Upper House election held on July 10, the ruling party coalition won 76 seats and the Liberal Democratic Party (LDP) won 63 seats, the majority of the contested seats, out of 125 seats up for election.* It was a big win for the LDP. Our Japan Fund Manager, Wee Ban Yew, highlights 4 key points from the election outcome and his views on the market.

*Source: The Japan Times, “Sweeping LDP Upper House victory heralds fresh start for Kishida”, 10 July 2022

 

1. Solid outcome for Liberal Democratic Party (LDP), which who maintained majority of both Lower and Upper Houses. With the demise of ex-Prime Minster (PM) Shinzo Abe, the largest faction within LDP is now without a leader. There will be some uncertainty regarding this, but for the short-term, it could mean Prime Minster (PM) Fumio Kishida can now push for his own policies first. While Kishida started off being a little anti-stock market by talking about taxes on financial income, he has shifted gear towards more pro-market policies like income-doubling through personal investments. Otherwise, his policies are generally pro-growth.

 

2. The stock market generally reacts positively to a large LDP win (refer to Figure 1 below). This time, LDP will have 3 years to push forward policies as the next major election is in 2025. One of the major changes could be the restart of nuclear power plants that were idled after the Tohoku earthquake. This has become important with the Ukraine war curbing Russia oil and gas imports and the spike in energy costs. Another potential change could be the pacifist constitution. In terms of pro-constitution change parties, they make up 2/3 of both chambers, but it is still unknown if PM Kishida will push for constitution change since this was Abe’s project, but not Kishida’s.

 

Figure 1: Election results and stock price performance in past Upper House elections

In past Upper House elections, stock price performance was positive/neutral unless the LDP suffered a major defeat

Source: J.P. Morgan, Japan Equity Strategy, 11 July 2022

 

3. The next market focus could be the Bank of Japan (BOJ)’s next governor. The current governor was appointed by Abe and has pursued ultra-easy monetary policies. His tenure ends in Apr 2023. The next governor will be chosen by Kishida and the candidate chosen could indicate the future of BOJ policies.

 

4. In general, politics is not the primary driving factor for stock market in Japan when LDP is in power because LDP leadership works on consensus and in tandem with corporates. That said, Abe has done a lot for investors in Japan. He appointed a pro-market BOJ governor, shifted Government Pension Investment Fund (GDIF) investment policy to increase the weight in stocks, and introduced stewardship and governance codes for both investors and corporates to pay more attention to shareholders’ rights. Investors had benefitted from Abenomics in Japan.

 

Download Report

Topics

Categories

Share this article

Disclaimer

You will be leaving this website and will be redirected to a third party website. Please note that the 3rd party site is independent of this website. Lion Global Investors Limited makes no representations, accepts no responsibility for the content, security and privacy policies or the use of the 3rd party site or for that of subsequent links and shall not be liable for any loss or damages caused or alleged to be caused by or in connection with the use of or reliance on any such content, goods or services available on or through the 3rd party site or its subsequent links.

If you do not wish to continue to the 3rd party site, click Close or use the Back button on your web browser.

Disclaimer

You will be leaving this website and will be redirected to a third party website. Please note that the 3rd party site is independent of this website. Lion Global Investors Limited makes no representations, accepts no responsibility for the content, security and privacy policies or the use of the 3rd party site or for that of subsequent links and shall not be liable for any loss or damages caused or alleged to be caused by or in connection with the use of or reliance on any such content, goods or services available on or through the 3rd party site or its subsequent links.

If you do not wish to continue to the 3rd party site, click Close or use the Back button on your web browser.

Comparing the TER cost for 20 years

Here’s the difference a low cost advantage makes to cost savings

Here's how much you pay

$190,272.13
Selected TER 1.00% p.a.

$99,912.57
LionGlobal All Seasons Fund 0.5% p.a.

By investing a fund with low TER

You may save $90,359.56 over 20 years based on an initial investment of $1,000,000 compared with a TER of 0.5% p.a.

It is enough to provide for a monthly expenditure of $3,000 over the next 2 years and 6 months.

Here's how much you pay

$271,950.61
Selected TER 1.50% p.a.

$99,912.57
LionGlobal All Seasons Fund 0.5% p.a.

By investing a fund with low TER

You may save $172,038.04 over 20 years based on an initial investment of $1,000,000 compared with a TER of 0.5% p.a.

It is enough to provide for a monthly expenditure of $3,000 over the next 4 years and 9 months.

Here's how much you pay

$345,744.19
Selected TER 2.00% p.a.

$99,912.57
LionGlobal All Seasons Fund 0.5% p.a.

By investing a fund with low TER

You may save $ 245,831.62 over 20 years based on an initial investment of $1,000,000 compared with a TER of 0.5% p.a.

It is enough to provide for a monthly expenditure of $3,000 over the next 6 years and 9 months.

TER (Total Expense Ratio) is the sum of various identified operating expenses charged on an ongoing basis to the fund’s assets as a percentage of the fund’s average net asset value calculated over a 12-month period at the close of the annual and semi-annual financial statements of the fund for all the p.a. tabs (1.0%, 1.5%, 2.0%).

The above scenarios are for illustration purpose only. Past performance, as well as any prediction, projection or forecast on the economy, securities market or the economic trends of the markets are not necessarily indicative of the future or likely performance of the funds. Calculations based purely on costs with no market movement or investment returns.